There is a wall of
silence from the wind industry regarding wind turbine reliability.
But once in a while data seeps out through the wall to the general
public. A little bit of new seepage has just come to my notice.
The last time I blogged
about wind turbine reliability was after I had come across an obscure
department within the USA government National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL) called the Gearbox Reliability Collective (GRC). The purpose of this U.S. government sponsored department is to address the appalling and largely hidden reliability problems with wind turbines, particularly gearboxes.
The GRC has their own website here: http://www.nrel.gov/wind/grc/
My first post on the GRC is On This Link
The GRC is not alone.
Clearly there are several European agencies and groups working on
this problem too. Unfortunately information on them is very obscure.
I am unaware of any public access to their data other than when it is
mentioned by the GRC.
What has just caught my
attention is a 2013 paper from the GRC. The paper is titled:
Report on
Wind Turbine Subsystem Reliability ─ A Survey of Various Databases.
The paper is on this
link: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/59111.pdf
If you look at the
linked document above you will find a survey of many wind turbine
failure databases held in Europe and the USA.
As far as I can
ascertain there is no public access to any of this data except to
that presented in this paper. If I am wrong I would be grateful for
any links – I have found none.
The figures from Europe
in this survey stop short of fully quantifying failure rates. They
do though hint at a failure rate increase for larger turbines and
crucially, also for direct drive turbines.
We also have the USA
data in the same document. Some of the USA data goes right up to
2013. This American data is far more open and definitive. It gives
failure rates for all major components not just the gearboxes.
Here is the table (see
page 31) relating to expected annual gearbox and generator failure rates for
on-shore turbines.
The NREL reckons for gearboxes this
averages out at 5% per year for the first ten years. Notice that in year 5 it hits 10%.
Whatever way you cut
it statistically around about 50% of
turbines will suffer a gearbox failure within 10 years. Remember this
is for properly maintained, serviced and generally “looked after”
turbines.
But also remember –
that is ONLY the gearbox. The generator is “slightly” more
reliable coming out at an average failure rate of 3.5% per year or
35% over ten years.
So for an onshore
turbine in the USA the chances of a properly serviced and maintained
turbine failing due to gearbox or generator issues within 10 years
is 85%.
If you include the
other potential failure areas (say the blades - failure rate quoted
at 2% per annum) then statistically, it is almost surely that a properly
maintained and serviced wind turbine will suffer a major failure
within 10 years. It looks like most failures will occur in year 5 or
7.
All rotating machinery
can (and will) break down. But wind turbines are operating in a
chaotically changing and hostile environment (offshore turbines even
more so). A gas plant by comparison is operating in a closely
controlled and regulated environment. So per Megawatt-Hour, the wind
turbine will require much more maintenance.
The energy return from
a wind turbine is simply inadequate to pay for the very high demands
placed on maintenance and repair. As the machine gets older more
maintenance and repair will be required. Eventually the point will
be reached (7-10 years?) where the maintenance/repair bills exceed
the returns.
The often hyped 25 year life span for a wind turbine would appear to be hopelessly optimistic.
Currently the only way
round this problem is to hugely increase the price of the electricity
generated by the machine from day one. This is essentially what the
current government subsidies do.
But one day the
subsidies will have to fall. When this happens, or as the turbines
get older and more unreliable, the wind farms will end up being be
sold on - and on.
The new owners will be
ever more dubious organisations. Eventually the turbines will be run
until they suffer the final major failure that renders the turbine
beyond economic repair. Then they will be abandoned.
When the last one fails
and the payments stop, the bailiffs will arrive to claim the
“guaranteed” decommissioning fund. But by then the main company
office will be a post box in Belize and the decommissioning fund will
be long gone.
Remember almost all of
the data in the above paper is for on-shore turbines.
When you go offshore
the maintainability and reliability falls off a cliff. The consequent
subsidies sky-rocket.
But more on that in
another post.
2 comments:
To be honest, I see another scam in the making: stealing dying wind turbines for the scrap metals they contain. If the units are insured, this may well amount to insurance fraud of some sort as the stolen units will necessarily be claimed to be fully operational units capable of decades more operation, rather than barely-functional junkers.
The bailiff and Belize phrase is very apt. There hasn't been, as far as I know, any discussion on what constitutes abandonment of the sites. Offshore platforms and their pipelines are completely removed, no structure left. But the removal of a wind turbine, it's mono-tower, the inter machine cabling and the delivery cable will be expensive.
Onshore windfarms used enormous amounts of concrete and rebar to build the base, going down many metres, but with a surface presence. To become usable land again there would need to be an awful lot of heavy machinery and transport. Scrap value would be minimum for the steel, the alternator could fetch good money, gearbox etc depending on metal. The blades are non recyclable from what I've seen and in the US are being cut up and buried. Not very green
Post a Comment