Another detailed and
peer reviewed report on the effectiveness of wind power has been
recently published by the Adam Smith Institute. (h/t to @strumcrazy at twitter)
The report has been produced by an Engineer with a long history in the power generation industry including pumped
hydro. It's data is unimpeachable and is based on reliable wind speed
data obtained from airport meteorology stations.
The summary is
brutally factual and casts a long black shadow over all the vacuous
hype over wind power recently seen in the UK.
The document is
available Here
Here are some of those
brutal facts. (but by no means all)
Over one year the UK
model showed:
Power exceeds 90% of
available power for only 17 hours
Power exceeds 80% of
available power for 163 hours
Power is below 20%
of available power for 3,448 hours (20 weeks)
Power is below 10%
of available power for 1,519 hours (9 weeks)
The most common output
of the entire theoretical 10GW UK wind turbine fleet is 800MW or 8%.
The probability that
the wind fleet will produce full output is vanishingly small.
Long gaps in
significant wind production occur in all seasons.
To cover these gaps
would need energy storage equivalent to 15 Dinorwig size plants
(incidentally Dinorwig cost £1.5Bn. It is also not far short of being
geologically unique in the UK – Billo)
As we cannot build 15
Dinorwig's in the UK we could do what the German Energiewende is
doing and build dirty Lignite burning coal plant instead as backup. ( that is
not a serious suggestion by the way)
Of course, if this was
just one paper, however scrupulously prepared, we may well be entitled
to a level of skepticism about its findings.
But this is very far
from the first.
In 2010 The famous Nature conservancy charity “The John Muir Trust” commissioned a
report by Stuart Young Consulting. The John Muir Trust webpage on this report (with link) is Here The actual Paper on its own is Here
Stuart Young Consulting (using actual
generation data) found the following:
Over a two year period
(2008-10) The UK wind turbine fleet was:
- below 20% of capacity more than half the time
- below 10% of capacity over one third of the time
- below 2.5% capacity for the equivalent of one day in twelve
- below 1.25% capacity for the equivalent of just under one day a month
Again that is just a subset of the dismal performance they found.
Does it stop there? –
No. Here are a few more reports:
Reports by:
Mercados Consulting –
Powerful Targets (2012 originally suppressed by UK govt.) Link Here
Civitas – The Folly
of Windpower (2012) Link Here
Prof. G Hughs Edinburgh University - Why Is Wind Power So Expensive? (2012) Link Here
Prof. G Hughs Edinburgh University - Why Is Wind Power So Expensive? (2012) Link Here
The Royal Academy of
Engineers – The Cost of Generating Electricity (2004) Link Here
Note that the oldest of these reports
dates back some 10 years. This is not new knowledge but it has been
comprehensively buried and suppressed by the wind industry and their political
backers.
But as the saying goes:
The truth will out.
No comments:
Post a Comment